Soil science, population growth and food production: some historical developments

Author

• Alfred E. Hartemink

Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_6

Cite this paper as: 

Hartemink A.E. (2007) Soil science, population growth and food production: some historical developments. In: Bationo A., Waswa B., Kihara J., Kimetu J. (eds) Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht

Abstract

The world’s population has doubled since 1960. Currently, the developing world accounts for about 95% of the population growth with Africa as the world’s fastest growing continent. The growing population has many implications but most of all it requires an increase in agricultural production to meet food demand. Soil science has a long tradition of considering the growth in food production in relation to the increasing human population. This paper reviews some of the major developments in these subjects from a soil scientist’s perspective. It starts with the work of Thomas Malthus and various subsequent studies relating population growth and food production. Population growth and projections up to the year 2050 are discussed. The main soil studies since the 1920s are reviewed with a focus on those conducted in the Dutch East Indies and the UK. The productivity of soil science measured by the number of publications and soil scientists has kept pace with the increasing population. Although the number of undernourished people in the world is on the decline, it is concluded that continued efforts from soil scientists remains needed particularly now the focus of attention in the USA and Western Europe moves from population growth per se to population ageing and obesity.

Reference

1. The Economist December 20: 19–21.Google Scholar
2. Anon. 1999. Unshapely world, too old or too young. The Economist September 25: 60.
3. Bennett H.H. 1939. Soil Conservation. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc: New York & London.Google Scholar
4. Bettany G.T. 1890. Introduction. In: Malthus T.R. by An essay on the principle of population or a view of its past and present effects on human happiness with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal of mitigation of the evils which its occasions (6th and last edition). Ward, Lock and Co.: London, New York, and Melbourne.
5. Boserup E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth. The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Aldine Publishing Company: New York.Google Scholar
6. Bouma J. 2001. The new role of soil science in a network society. Soil Science 166: 874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bouma J., Batjes N.H. and Groot J.J.R. 1998. Exploring land quality effects on world food supply. Geoderma 86: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bouma J. and Hartemink A.E. 2002. Soil science and society in the Dutch context. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 50: 133–140.Google Scholar
9. Bradfield R. 1960. Opportunities for soil scientists in freeing the world from hunger. In 7th International Congress of Soil Science, Madison, Wisconsin, 1960. pp. 1–10.
10. Buringh P. 1982. Potentials of world soils for agricultural production. In 12th International Congress of Soil Science, New Delhi, 1982. pp. 33–41.
11. Buringh P., van Heemst H.D.J. and Staring G.J. 1975. Computation of the absolute maximum food production of the world. Agricultural University, Department of Tropical Soil Science: Wageningen.Google Scholar
12. Dudal R. 1982. Land degradation in a world perspective. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37: 245–249.Google Scholar
13. Edelman C.H. 1951. De onuitputtelijke natuur. Economische-Statistische Berichten, 12 Sept., 1–4.Google Scholar
14. Ehrlich P. 1968. The population bomb. Ballantine Book Inc.: New York.Google Scholar
15. Eswaran H., Beinroth F.H. and Reich P. 1999. Global land resources and population-supporting capacity. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. FAO 2000. Agriculture: Towards 2015/30, Rome.
17. Fischer G. and Heilig G.K. 1997. Population momentum and the demand on land and water resources. In: Greenland D.J., Gregory P.J. and Nye P.H. (Eds) Land resources: on the edge of the Malthusian precipice? pp. 869–889. The Royal Society: London.Google Scholar
18. Gallopin G.C. and Raskin P. 1998. Windows on the future – Global Scenarios and sustainability. Environment 40: 7–11.Google Scholar
19. Greenland D.J. 1991. The contributions of soil science to society – past, present, and future. Soil Science 151: 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Greenland D.J. 1994. Soil science and sustainable land management. In: Syers J.K. and Rimmer D.L. (Eds) Soil science and sustainable land management in the tropics. pp. 1–5. CAB International: Wallingford.Google Scholar
21. Greenland D.J., Gregory P.J. and Nye P.H. 1997. Introduction and conclusions. In:Greenland D.J., Gregory P.J. and Nye P.H. (Eds). Land resources: on the edge of the Malthusian precipice? pp. 861–867. The Royal Society: London.Google Scholar
22. Greenwood D.J. 1993. The changing scene of British soil science. Journal of Soil Science 44: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hall A.D. 1936. The improvement of native agriculture in relation to population and public health. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
24. Harris J.M. and Kennedy S. 1999. Carrying capacity in agriculture: global and regional issues. Ecological Economics 29: 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Hartemink A.E. 1999. Publish or perish (2) How much we write. Bulletin of the International Union of Soil Sciences 96: 16–23.Google Scholar
26. Hartemink A.E. 2003. Soil fertility decline in the tropics – with case studies on plantations. ISRIC-CABI Publishing: Wallingford.Google Scholar
27. Hartemink A.E. 2002a. Publishing in soil science – Historical developments and current trends. International Union of Soil Sciences, Vienna. p. 196.Google Scholar
28. Hartemink A.E. 2002b. Soil science in tropical and temperate regions – Some differences and similarities. Advances in Agronomy 77: 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Heuvelink G.B.M. and Webster R. 2001. Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future. Geoderma 100: 269–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Howard A. 1940. An agricultural testament. Oxford University Press: New York and London.Google Scholar
31. Huber P. 1999. Hard green. Saving the environment from the environmentalist. A conservative manifesto. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
32. Insam H. 2001. Developments in soil microbiology since the mid 1960s. Geoderma 100: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Jacks G.V. and Whyte R.O. 1939. The rape of the earth – A world survey of soil erosion. Faber and Faber Ltd: London.Google Scholar
34. Jensen N.F. 1978. Limits to growth in world food production. Science 201: 317–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Kellogg C.E. 1974. Soil genesis, classification, and cartography: 1924–1974. Geoderma 12: 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Kendall H.W. and Pimentel D. 1994. Constraints on the expansion of the global food supply. Ambio 23: 198–205.Google Scholar
37. Lal R. 2001. Managing world soils for food security and environmental quality. Advances in Agronomy 74: 155–192.Google Scholar
38. Latham J.R. 2000. There’s enough food for everyone, but the poor can’t afford to buy it. Nature 404: 222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Lomborg B. 2001. The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
40. Lutz W., Sanderson W. and Scherbov S. 1997. Doubling of world population unlikely. Nature 387: 803–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Malthus T.R 1826. An essay on the principle of population or a view of its past and present effects on human happiness with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal of mitigation of the evils which its occasions. Ward, Lock and Co.: London, New York, and Melbourne.Google Scholar
42. McCalla A.F. 1999. The challenge of food security in the 21st century. TAA Newsletter 19: 12–19.Google Scholar
43. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J. and Behrens W.W. 1972. Limits to growth. A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books: New York.Google Scholar
44. Mermut A.R. and Eswaran H. 1997. Opportunities for soil science in a milieu of reduced funds. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 77: 1–7.Google Scholar
45. Mermut A.R. and Eswaran H. 2001. Some major developments in soil science since the mid-1960s. Geoderma 100: 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Mohr E.C.J. 1947. De wereldvoedselproductie en de bodem. Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift 59: 1–8.Google Scholar
47. Nye P.H. and Greenland D.J. 1960. The soil under shifting cultivation. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils: Harpenden.Google Scholar
48. Osborn F. 1948. Our plundered planet. Little, Brown and Company: Boston.Google Scholar
49. Penck A. 1928. Das Hauptproblem der physischen Anthropogeographie. In First International Congress of Soil Science, Washington DC, 1928. pp 98–116.
50. Pendleton R.L. 1954. The place of tropical soils in feeding the world. Ceiba 15: 201–222.Google Scholar
51. Penning de Vries F.W.T., Rabbinge R. and Groot J.J.R. 1997. Potential and attainable food production and food security in different regions. In: Greenland D.J., Gregory P.J. and Nye P.H. (Eds). Land resources: on the edge of the Malthusian precipice? pp 917–928. The Royal Society: London.Google Scholar
52. Pinstrup-Andersen P. 1998. Food security and sustainable use of natural resources. Ecological Economics 26: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Raats P.A.C. 2001. Developments in soil-water physics since the mid 1960s. Geoderma 100: 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Ross C. 1999. Can we feed the world in 2020? New Zealand Soil News 47: 137–141.Google Scholar
55. Russell D.A. and Williams G.G. 1977. History of chemical fertilizer development. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41: 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Russell E.J. 1954. World population and world food supplies. George Allen & Unwin Ltd: London.Google Scholar
57. Seidl I. and Tisdell C.A. 1999. Carrying capacity reconsidered: from Malthus’ population theory to cultural carrying capacity. Ecological Economics 31: 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Short R. 1998. An essay on the principle of population, by T.R. Malthus. Nature 395: 456–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Sinclair T.R. and Cassman K.G. 1999. Green revolution still too green. Nature 398, 556.Google Scholar
60. Smil V 1999 How many billions to go? Nature 401: 429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. Sparks D.L. 2001. Elucidating the fundamental chemistry of soils: past and recent achievements and future frontiers. Geoderma 100: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Stamp L.D. 1960. Our developing world. Faber and Faber: London.Google Scholar
63. Tiffen M., Mortimore M. and Gichuki F. 1994. More people, less erosion. Environmental recovery in Kenya. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.Google Scholar
64. Tinker P.B. 1985. Soil science in a changing world. Journal of Soil Science 36: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Tuljapurkar S. 1997. Demography – Taking the measure of uncertainty. Nature 387: 760–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. van Baren F.A. 1960. Soils in relation to population in tropical regions. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 51: 230–234.Google Scholar
67. van Baren J.H.V., Hartemink A.E. and Tinker P.B. 2000. 75 Years The International Society of Soil Science. Geoderma 96: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. White J.T. 1941. Bodemvruchtbaarheid en landsbelang. Archipel Drukkerij, Buitenzorg.
69. Yaalon D.H and Berkowicz S. 1997. History of soil science – International perspectives. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen. 438 p.Google Scholar
70. Young A. 1999. Is there really spare land? A critique of estimates of available cultivable land in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_6