Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?kw=cellulosic%20bioenergy%20crops;pg=11
María B. Villamil, Myles Alexander, Anne Heinze Silvis and Michael E. Gray
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, vol. 16, issue 6, pages 3604-3612
Abstract: The availability of reliable information tailored to the needs of producers has a central role in the innovation decision process in agriculture. The authors explored the information needs and preferences for delivery formats and channels of farmers in the state of Illinois, USA, as they consider introducing bioenergy crops in their current production systems. We used surveys and focus groups to target farming populations from northern, central, and southern regions of the state to identify characteristics of potential adopters and evidence of regional differences. In addition, we examined farmers’ planning in response to energy uncertainties, and their opinions regarding the optimal crop to meet energy demands. Across the state, 24% of respondents were identified as potential adopters of bioenergy crops; regions within the state showed similar results. The likelihood of adoption increased 16 times if the farmer was categorized as a potential user of alternative fuels and increased two times for each new crop planned for the coming growing season. Four main areas of information needs were identified and categorized as (1) understanding agronomy and markets, (2) concerns and supporting policies, (3) market readiness and business uncertainty, and (4) operational advantages. Though no interaction of region by adopter was found, there are clear statistical differences among regions and potential adopters regarding information needs. Conferences, meetings and field days (venues with a high level of interaction among stakeholders) are preferred delivery formats. Other farmers, neighbors and friends, as well as university and extension services, were the most valued sources of information.
Keywords: Energy crops; Adopters; Users; Farmer perceptions; Channels and sources; Survey methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211200216X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211200216X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?kw=cellulosic%20bioenergy%20crops;pg=11
No comments:
Post a Comment