Blog List

Monday, 9 October 2017

Predicting the Potential Distribution of Plant Diversity in the Yukarıgökdere Forest District of the Mediterranean Region

Author
Revised: March 2014

Author Affiliations

Kürşad Özkan
Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, Division of Soil Science and Ecology, 32260 Isparta, Turkey
Author for correspondence: 
Uta Berger
Institute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, TU Dresden, P.O. 1117, 01735 Tharandt, Germany

ABSTRACT:

Biodiversity is of crucial importance for ecosystem health and functioning. It is thus one of the most important topics in forest ecology. This study focuses on modelling the spatial distribution of vascular plant diversity (H), richness (S) and evenness (E) in the Yukarıgökdere forest district (14667 ha) located in transition zone between Mediterranean and continental climates in the Mediterranean region, Turkey. Species abundance was sampled at 95 sample plots extending from 1000 to 1900 m a.s.l. in order to calculate the response variables (H, S, E). Climatic and topographical data served as explanatory variables. Multiple regression (ML) and classification and regression tree technique (CART) were used to obtain the distribution models of response variables. The better results were provided by CART. That is why visual assessments of the predicted values of the response variables based on (CART) were performed. The explained variances of the model trees were 63.4, 63.1 and 44.5% for H, S and E respectively. Elevation was found to be the most important environmental factor for all response variables. The higher H and S values were found at the east lower part (1000–1150 m a.s.l.) and the west upper part (1500–1800 m a.s.l.) of the district. The evenness (E) shows generally higher relative values in the upper part of the area. The lowest E specifies the area being optimal for tree growing. It is located between 1400 and 1500 m a.s.l., and ranges from the north to the south in the district.

6. REFERENCES

Aertsen W., Kint V., Orshoven J., Özkan K., Muys B. 2010 — Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests — Ecol. Model. 221: 1119–1130.Crossref
Araújo M.B., Thuiller W., Williams P.H., Reginster I. 2005 — Downscaling European species atlas distribution to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning — Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 17–30. Crossref
Atalay I. 1987 — The ecological conditions of the natural occurrence areas of cedar (Cedruslibani A. Rich.) and regioning of seed transfer of cedar in Turkey — Forest Ministry Press, Ankara, Turkey, 663/61 167 pp.
Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R., Stone C. 1984 — Classification and Regression Trees — CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Burke A., Esler K.J., Pienaar E., Barnard P. 2003 — Species Richness and Floristic Relationships between Mesas and Their Surroundings in Southern African Nama Karoo — Diversity and Distribution 9: 43–53. Crossref
Chandra J., Rawat V.S., Rawat Y.S., Ram J. 2010 — Vegetational diversity along an altitudinal range in Garhwal Himalaya — Int. J. of Biodiv. Conserv. 2: 14–18.
Chang-Fu H., Zueng-Sang C., Yueh-Mei H., Kuoh-Chieng Y., Tsung-Hsin H. 1998 — Altitudinal zonation of evergreen broad-leaved forest on Mount Lopei, Taiwan — J. Veget. Sci. 9: 201–212. Crossref
Chu C., Tsai B., Chang K. 2009 — Integrating decision tree and spatial cluster analysis for landslide susceptibility zonation — World. Acad. Sci. Eng. Tech. 59: 479–483.
Corona P., Scotti R., Tarchiani N. 1998. Relationship between environmental factors and site index in Douglas-fir plantations in central Italy — Forest. Ecol. Manag. 110: 195–207. Crossref
Crawley M.J. 2002 — Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus — John Wiley & Sons, New York, 761 pp.
De'ath G., Fabricius K.E. 2000 — Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis — Ecology 11: 3178–3192. Crossref
de Lamo X., Sebastiá M.T. 2006 — Role of biogeographical, ecological and management factors on plant diversity in grasslands — Grassland Science in Europe 11: 832–834.
Drapeau P., Leduc A., Giraux J.F. 2000 — Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests — Ecol. Monogr. 70: 423–444. Crossref
Drummond S.T., Sudduth K.A., Joshi A., Birrell S.J., Kitchen N.R. 2003 — Statistical and neural methods for site-specific yield prediction — Transactions of the ASAE, 46: 5–14. Crossref
Dufour A., Gadallah F., Wagner H.H., Guisan A., Buttler A. 2006 — Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effect of variability and spatial configuration — Ecography, 29: 573–584. Crossref
Dutoit T., Buisson E., Gerboud E., Roche P., Tatoni T. 2007 — The status of transitions between cultivated fields and their boundaries: ecotones, ecoclines or edge effects? Acta. Oecol. 31: 127–136. Crossref
Fakir H., Gundogdu E., Senturk O. 2009 — Mapping of fauna and flora in functional planning based on geographical information systems: A case study from Yukarıgökdere, Isparta, Turkey — Fresenius Environ. Bull. 18: 1992–1998.
FAO, IRIC, ISSS 1998 — World reference bas efor soil resources — Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
Field A. 2005 — Discovering statistics using SPSS — SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 781 pp.
Fontaine M., Aerts R., Ozkan K., Mert A., Gulsoy S., Suel H., Waelkens M., Muys B. 2007 — Elevation and exposition rather than soil types determine communities and site suitability in Mediterranean mountain forests of southern Anatolia, Turkey — Forest. Ecol. Manag. 247: 18–25. Crossref
Grytnes J.A., Vetaas O.R. 2002 — Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal — Am. Nat. 159: 294–304.Crossref
Hashemi S.A. 2010 — Evaluating plant species diversity and physiographical factors in natural broad leaf forest — Am. J. Environ. Sci. 6:20–25. Crossref
Hastie T.J., Tibshirani R.J. 1990 — Generalized additive models — Monographs of statistics and applied probability 43. Chapman & Hall, London, p. 336.
Heydari M., Mahdavi A. 2009 — Pattern of plant species diversity in related to physiograptic factors in Melah Gavan Protected Area, Iran — Asian. J. Biol. Sci. 2: 21–28. Crossref
Hijmans R.J., Cameron S.E., Parra J.L., Jones P.G., Jarvis A. 2005 — Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas — Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965–1978. Crossref
Joseph S., Reddy S.C., Pattanaik C., Sudhakar S. 2008 — Distribution of plant communities along climatic and topographic gradients in Mudumalia Wildlife Sanctuary (Southern India) — Biol. Lett. 45: 29–41.
Kantarci M.D. 1991 — The site classification of Mediterranean region, Turkey — Forest Ministry Press, vol 668, Ankara, Turkey, 150 pp.
Lundholm J.T., Larson D.W. 2003 — Relationships between spatial environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity on a limestone pavement — Ecography, 26: 715–722. Crossref
Mareno C., Zuria I., García-Zentono M., Sánches-Rojas G., Castellanos I., Martínes-Morales M., Rojas-Martínes A. 2006 — Trends in the measurement of alpha diversity in the last two decades — Interciencia, 31: 67–71.
MathSoft S-Plus 4 1997 — Guide to Statistics MathSoft, Inc., Seattle, WA.
Moisen G.G., Frescino T.S. 2002 — Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics — Ecol. Model. 157: 209–225. Crossref
Neumann M., Starlinger F. 2001 — The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests — Forest. Ecol. Manag. 145: 91–106. Crossref
Odum E.P. 1971 — Fundamentals of Ecology — W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphie.
Ojeda F., Maraňón T., Arroyo J. 2000 — Plant diversity patterns in the Aljibe Mountains (S. Spain): a comprehensive account — Biodiversity & Conservation, 9: 1323–1343. Crossref
Özkan K. 2005 — Determination of strict protected national zone according to relationships between geomorphological features and plant diversity on Gedikli site section group … Int. Symposium on Protected Natural Areas, Isparta, Turkey, 655–658 pp.
Özkan K., Kantarci M.D. 2008 — Subregions and site section groups on Beysehir Watershed — SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal, 2: 123–135.
Özkan K., Suel H. 2008 — Endemic plant species in a karstic canyon (Mediterranean Region, Turkey): relation to relief and vegetation diversity — Pol. J. Ecol. 56: 709–715.
Özkan K., Gulsoy S. 2009 — Effects of environmental factors on the productivity of Crimean pine (Pinus nigra ssp. pallasiana) in Sutculer, Turkey — J. Environ. Biol. 30: 965–970.
Özkan K., Senol H., Gulsoy S., Mert A., Suel H., Eser Y. 2009 — Vegetation environment relationships in Mediterranean mountain forests on limeless bedrocks of Southern Anatolia, Turkey — J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 17: 154–163. Crossref
Özkan K., Negiz M.G. 2011 — Woody vegetation classification and mapping by using hierarchical methods in Isparta-Yukarigokdere district — SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal, 12: 27–33.
Pausas J.G., Sáez L. 2000 — Pteridophyte richness in the NE Iberian Peninsula: biogeographic patterns — Plant. Ecol. 148:195–205. Crossref
Poulos H.M., Taylor A.H., Beaty R.M. 2007 — Environmental controls on dominance and diversity of woody plant species in a Madrean, Sky Island Ecosystem, Arizona, USA — Plant. Ecol. 193: 15–30. Crossref
Safford D.H., Harrison S. 2004 — Fire effects on plant diversity in serpentine vs. sandstone chaparral — Ecology, 85: 539–548. Crossref
Shannon C.E. 1948. A Mathematical theory of communication — The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423. Crossref
Sherman R.E., Martin P.H., Fahey T.J. 2005 — Vegetation-environmental relationships in forest ecosystems of the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic — Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 132: 293–310. BioOne
Stone M. 1974 — Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions — J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. Stat. Meth. 36: 111–147.
Thompson I.D., Mackey B., McNulty S., Mosseler A. 2009 — Forest resilience, biodiversity and climate change. A synthesis of the bio diversity/resilience/stability relationships in forest ecosystems — Secretariat of the Convention on Biodiversity, Montreal, vol. 43. 67 pp.
Thuiller W., Midgley G.F., Rouget M., Cowling R.M. 2006 — Predicting patterns of plant species richness in mega diverse South Africa — Ecography, 29: 733–744. Crossref
Qi Y., Yang Y. 1999 — Topographic effect on spatial variation of plant diversity in California — Geogr. Inform. Sci. 5: 39–46.
Weiss A. 2001 — Topographic position and landforms analysis — Poster presentation, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA.
Whittaker R.H. 1972 — Evolution and measurement of species diversity — Taxon, 21: 213–251. Crossref
Wohlgemuth T., Gigon A. 2003 — Calcicole plant diversity in Switzerland may reflect a variety of habitat templets — Folia Geobotanica, 38: 443–452. Crossref
Wohlgemuth T., Nobis M.P., Kienast F., Plattnes M. 2008 — Modelling Vascular Plant Diversity at the Landscape Scale using Systematic Samples — J. Biogeogr. 35: 1226– 1240. Crossref
Wolf J.H.D., Flamenco A. 2003 — Patterns in Species Richness and Distribution of Vascular Epiphytes in Chiapas, Mexico — J. Biogeogr. 30: 1689–1707. Crossref
Yang L., YiPing Z., DaMing H., Min D., Hua Z. 2007 — Climatic Control of Plant Species Richness along Elevation Gradients in the Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region — Chin. Sci. Bull. 52: 50–58. Crossref
Zhao C.M., Chen W.L., Tian Z.Q., Xie Z.Q. 2005 — Altitudinal pattern of plant species diversity in Shennongjia Mountains, Central China — J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 47: 1431– 1449. Crossref
For further details logon website :
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3161/104.062.0306

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...