Published Date
, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 601–611
Thematic Issue: Advanced Modeling and Innovative Processes
Cite this article as:
Strano, M., Albertelli, P., Chiappini, E. et al. Int J Mater Form (2015) 8: 601. doi:10.1007/s12289-014-1215-6
Abstract
Titanium alloys, mainly because of their poor thermal conductivity, need to be cut at relatively low cutting speeds, with obvious negative consequences on the profitability of machining. An important amount of research has been done in order to increase productivity in titanium machining operations: high performance coatings and innovative technologies to improve insert resistance to wear represent promising solutions. In this work, a highly performing cutting insert (coated with a TiAlN layer obtained by Physical Vapor Deposition(PVD) magnetron sputtering) has been tested against the option of applying a Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT), when used for rough turning of aerospace titanium. The effects of the DCT have been experimentally investigated with two different experimental plans at low and high cutting speeds (respectively vc ≤ 50 m/min, vc ≥ 60 m/min). Statistical analyses of the results have been performed. The results show that at low cutting speed, the DCT treatment does not increase the tool life. At higher values of vc, flank wear vs. time curves of coated tools have been determined, with and without DCT, and they clearly show that cryogenically treated tools present better wear resistance at higher cutting speeds. The wear mechanisms on the rake face and the flank for these two TiAlN coated tools have been analysed using a scanning electron microscope. The adhesion of titanium on the tool surface is lower for a DCT treated insert. The results indicate that the hardening of tools induced by the cryogenic treatment improves their useful life in high rate machining of titanium.
References
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12289-014-1215-6
, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 601–611
Thematic Issue: Advanced Modeling and Innovative Processes
- First Online:
- 10 January 2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-014-1215-6
Title
Wear behaviour of PVD coated and cryogenically treated tools for Ti-6Al-4V turning
Abstract
Titanium alloys, mainly because of their poor thermal conductivity, need to be cut at relatively low cutting speeds, with obvious negative consequences on the profitability of machining. An important amount of research has been done in order to increase productivity in titanium machining operations: high performance coatings and innovative technologies to improve insert resistance to wear represent promising solutions. In this work, a highly performing cutting insert (coated with a TiAlN layer obtained by Physical Vapor Deposition(PVD) magnetron sputtering) has been tested against the option of applying a Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT), when used for rough turning of aerospace titanium. The effects of the DCT have been experimentally investigated with two different experimental plans at low and high cutting speeds (respectively vc ≤ 50 m/min, vc ≥ 60 m/min). Statistical analyses of the results have been performed. The results show that at low cutting speed, the DCT treatment does not increase the tool life. At higher values of vc, flank wear vs. time curves of coated tools have been determined, with and without DCT, and they clearly show that cryogenically treated tools present better wear resistance at higher cutting speeds. The wear mechanisms on the rake face and the flank for these two TiAlN coated tools have been analysed using a scanning electron microscope. The adhesion of titanium on the tool surface is lower for a DCT treated insert. The results indicate that the hardening of tools induced by the cryogenic treatment improves their useful life in high rate machining of titanium.
References
- 1. Olovsjö S, Hammersberg P, Avdovic P et al (2011) Methodology for evaluating effects of material characteristics on machinability—theory and statistics-based modelling applied on alloy 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:55–66. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3503-3CrossRef
- 2.Ezugwu EO, Wang Z (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Technol
- 3.Hughes JI, Sharman ARC, Ridgway K (2006) The effect of cutting tool material and edge geometry on tool life and workpiece surface integrity. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220:93–107. doi:10.1243/095440506X78192CrossRef
- 4.Wyen C-F, Wegener K (2010) Influence of cutting edge radius on cutting forces in machining titanium. CIRP Ann Technol 59:93–96CrossRef
- 5.Jawaid A, Che-Haron CH, Abdullah A (1999) Tool wear characteristics in turning of titanium alloy Ti-6246. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:329–334. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00246-0CrossRef
- 6.Ezugwu EO, Da Silva R (2005) Evaluation of the performance of CBN tools when turning Ti–6Al–4V alloy with high pressure coolant supplies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1009–1014CrossRef
- 7.Özel T, Sima M, Srivastava AK, Kaftanoglu B (2010) Investigations on the effects of multi-layered coated inserts in machining Ti–6Al–4V alloy with experiments and finite element simulations. CIRP Ann Technol 59:77–82CrossRef
- 8.Jawaid A, Sharif S, Koksal S (2000) Evaluation of wear mechanisms of coated carbide tools when face milling titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 99:266–274CrossRef
- 9.Jaffery SHI, Mativenga PT (2011) Wear mechanisms analysis for turning Ti-6Al-4V—towards the development of suitable tool coatings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:479–493. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3427-yCrossRef
- 10.Ibrahim GA, Haron CHC, Ghani JA (2009) Surface integrity of ti-6al-4v eli when machined using coated carbide tools under dry cutting condition. Int J Mech Mater Eng
- 11.Nouari M, Calamaz M, Haddag B, Girot F (2013) Analysis of coating performances in machining titanium alloys for aerospace applications. Int J Mach Mach Mater 13:158–173
- 12.Srivastava AK, Iverson J (2010) An experimental investigation into the high speed turning of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Int Manuf Sci Eng Conf 401–408
- 13.Liu Z, An Q, Xu J et al (2013) Wear performance of (nc-AlTiN)/(a-Si3N4) coating and (nc-AlCrN)/(a-Si3N4) coating in high-speed machining of titanium alloys under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions. Wear 305:249–259. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2013.02.001CrossRef
- 14.Prengel H, Jindal P, Wendt K et al (2001) A new class of high performance PVD coatings for carbide cutting tools. Surf Coat Technol 139:25–34CrossRef
- 15.Hosokawa A, Shimamura K, Ueda T (2012) Cutting characteristics of PVD-coated tools deposited by unbalanced magnetron sputtering method. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:95–98CrossRef
- 16.Evans C, Bryan JB (1991) Cryogenic diamond turning of stainless steel. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 40:571–575CrossRef
- 17.Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Muñoz-Escalona P, Newman ST (2013) State-of-the-art cryogenic machining and processing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26:616–648. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2012.749531CrossRef
- 18.Mohan Lal D, Renganarayanan S, Kalanidhi A (2001) Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steels. Cryogenics (Guildf) 41:149–155CrossRef
- 19.Gill S, Singh H, Singh R, Singh J (2010) Cryoprocessing of cutting tool materials—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:175–192CrossRef
- 20.Gill SS, Singh J, Singh H, Singh R (2011) Investigation on wear behaviour of cryogenically treated TiAlN coated tungsten carbide inserts in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.10.003CrossRef
- 21.Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2006) Performance of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:638–643. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0379-0CrossRef
- 22.Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2006) Performance evaluation of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:2051–2056. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.002CrossRef
- 23.Yong J, Ding C (2011) Effect of cryogenic treatment on WC–Co cemented carbides. Mater Sci Eng A 528:1735–1739. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.009CrossRef
- 24.Gill SS, Singh R, Singh H, Singh J (2009) Wear behaviour of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts under dry and wet turning conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:256–260. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.11.001CrossRef
- 25.Thakur D, Ramamoorthy B, Vijayaraghavan L (2008) Influence of different post treatments on tungsten carbide–cobalt inserts. Mater Lett 62:4403–4406. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2008.07.043CrossRef
- 26.SreeramaReddy TV, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, Venkatram R (2009) Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:181–185. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.04.007CrossRef
- 27.Gill SS, Singh J, Singh H, Singh R (2011) Metallurgical and mechanical characteristics of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide (WC–Co). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:119–131. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3369-4CrossRef
- 28.Holman J (2011) Experimental methods for engineers. Mcgraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering. 800
- 29.Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th ed. New York
- 30.Thévenaz P, Unser M (2007) User-friendly semiautomated assembly of accurate image mosaics in microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 70:135–146. doi:10.1002/jemt.20393CrossRef
- 31.Nouari M, Ginting A (2006) Wear characteristics and performance of multi-layer CVD-coated alloyed carbide tool in dry end milling of titanium alloy. Surf Coat Technol 200:5663–5676CrossRef
- 32.Holmberg K, Mathews A (1994) Coatings tribology: a concept, critical aspects and future directions. Thin Solid Films 253:173–178. doi:10.1016/0040-6090(94)90315-8CrossRef
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12289-014-1215-6
No comments:
Post a Comment