Published Date
Forest Policy and Economics
September 2016, Vol.70:47–55, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.021
Author
Fen Luo a,b,,
Brent D. Moyle b,,
Jigang Bao c,
Yongde Zhong a,
Tourism
Conservation
Spatiality
Institution
National Forest Parks
China
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14476770/19
Forest Policy and Economics
September 2016, Vol.70:47–55, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.021
Author
aCollege of Tourism, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 410004, e-no.498, Shaoshan South Road, Changsha, Hunan, China
bGriffith Institute for Tourism, Griffith University, Building (G27) Room 3.03, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
cCentre for Tourism and Planning Research, No. 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, Yat-sen University, 512007, China
Received 10 December 2015. Revised 26 May 2016. Accepted 26 May 2016. Available online 3 June 2016.
Highlights
- Explored the role of institutions in the production of space for tourism to National Forest Parks (NFPs) in China.
- •Demonstrates how institutional changes mirrored the dynamic role in NFPs played by the state, capital and society in China.
- •A three-phased conceptual triad depicting the shift in the state, capital and society in NFPs in China from 1982- 2014.
- •Future research should focus on the interaction between the state, capital and society at the local level.
Abstract
Nature-based tourism is a global phenomenon, with traditional forms of use of natural areas, such as wood harvesting and agriculture, paving the way for ecotourism. However, there has been limited exploration of the role of institutions in driving this transition. Consequently, this paper sought to explore the role of institutions in producing space for tourism within National Forest Parks (NFPs) in China. To achieve this objective 68 national-level policy documents from 1949 to 2014 were collected and analyzed. Findings demonstrate a transformation in the role of NFPs, orchestrated by the state, capital and society for tourism. In particular, NFPs, as an ideological space in national development, were not only an outcome of economic, social, political, and ecological processes, but also balanced the power between the state, capital and society. Institutional changes mirrored the dynamic relationship between the state, capital and society in China. Future research should focus on the role of institutions in producing space for tourism for and within parks at the local level, especially in developing contexts.
Keywords
- ⁎ Corresponding author.
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14476770/19
No comments:
Post a Comment