Find the information such as human life, natural resource,agriculture,forestry, biotechnology, biodiversity, wood and non-wood materials.
Blog List
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Antifungal activity of the essential oils from Cupressus arizonica var. arizonica and var. glabra
Published Date 23 December 2015, Vol.77:614–623,doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.026 Author
W. Khouaja a,b
R. Oliveira a
A. Raies b
A.C.P. Dias a,,
aCITAB—Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
bLaboratoire des Microorganismes et Biomolécules Actives, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Université Tunis El-Manar, 2092 El-Manar II Tunis, Tunisia
Received 5 May 2015. Revised 30 July 2015. Accepted 11 August 2015. Available online 30 September 2015.
Abstract
The composition and the evaluation of the antifungal activity and the mechanisms of action of the essential oils (EO) ofCupressus arizonicaleaves of two varieties,glabraandarizonica, were studied. EOs were extracted by hydrodistillation and the chemical composition was determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Both var.arizonicaand var.glabraEOs, displayed high contents of α-pinene (29.76% and 26.53%, respectively) and umbellulone (11.86% and 15.05%, respectively). The antifungal activity of the EOs of both varieties against pathogenic yeasts of the genusCandidawas investigated and showed that very low concentrations of var.glabraEO, such as 5.10−2μl/ml, were sufficient to inhibit growth of most of the species, while, all species, exceptCandida albicans(MIC = 5 × 10−2μl/ml), were inhibited for growth with only 10−2μl/ml when the EO of var.arizonicawas used.
The cytotoxicity of the EOs was assessed inSaccharomyces cerevisiae(used as a yeast experimental model) wild type and mutants affected in oxidative stress response and DNA repair pathways. Oxidative stress imposed by the EOs was determined by flow cytometry and the genotoxicity was assessed by yeast comet assay. A higher loss of yeast viability was observed with incubation of the EO from var.arizonica(5 × 10−2μl/ml, 60% viability loss) compared to var.glabra(5 × 10−2μl/ml, 30% viability loss).DNA damage was observed as long comet tails when cells were exposed to the EO of var.arizonicaand of var.glabra, (17 and 13 μm, respectively), compared to the negative control (5 μm). Intracellular oxidation increased in cells treated with the EOs, the var.arizonicabeing more active in the oxidant activity. The results obtained with the wild type yeast strain suggest that the EOs cause toxicity via an oxidative mechanism. To investigate the mechanism of oxidation, mutants affected in the oxidative stress response (yap1) and base excision repair DNA pathway (apn1) were investigated. The results show that theyap1andapn1yeast mutant strains are more sensitive to EOs than the wild type. For mutants affected in nucleotide excision repair (rad4), a pathway not involved in the repair of oxidative DNA damage, the results were similar to those obtained with the wild type.
No comments:
Post a Comment