Find the information such as human life, natural resource,agriculture,forestry, biotechnology, biodiversity, wood and non-wood materials.
Blog List
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Effects of volatile chemical components of wood species on mould growth susceptibility and termite attack resistance of wood plastic composites
Published Date May 2015, Vol.100:106–115,doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.02.002 Author
Kaimeng Xu a,,
Jing Feng b
Tuhua Zhong c
Zhifeng Zheng a
Taian Chen a
aCollege of Material Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, PR China
bGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou 510070, PR China
cDivision of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Received 5 December 2014. Revised 2 February 2015. Accepted 4 February 2015. Available online 9 March 2015.
Highlights
Wood species was a potential factor to biodegradation resistance of wood plastic composites.
•
The channels between wood flour and PVC existed for movement of spores and hyphae.
•
WPC made from Cunninghamia lanceolata and Melaleuca leucadendra had excellent abilities to biodegradation resistance.
•
WPC made from Liquidambar formosana, Pinus massoniana and Ricinus communishad weak abilities on biodegradation resistance.
Abstract This study mainly aimed at investigating the effects of volatile chemical components of wood species on mould and termite resistance of wood plastic composites (WPC) using artificial accelerated tests. The morphology characterization of surface and fracture of WPC was estimated by SEM and digital instrument. Volatile chemical components of wood species extractives were analyzed by GC–MS. The results indicated that the sequences of mould resistance of WPC were ranked as:Cunninghamia lanceolataandMelaleuca leucadendra(level 0) > Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla(level 1) > Pinus massoniana(level 2) > Liquidambar formosanaandRicinus communis(level 4). The sequences of termite resistance of WPC were ranked as:C. lanceolata(level 1, ML = 4.52%) > M. leucadendra(level 1, ML = 5.73%) > E. grandis × E. urophylla(level 1, ML = 6.48%) > L. formosana(level 2, ML = 6.72%) > P. massoniana(level 2, ML = 7.08%) > R. communis(level 3, ML = 10.40%). It was also suggested that 8-propoxy-cedrane, cedrol, α-cedrene and β-cedrene inC. lanceolata, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-3,7-benzofurandiol, 3-demethyl-colchicine and squalene inM. leucadendra; 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-3,7-benzofurandiol and stigmast-4-en-3-one inE. grandis × E. urophyllawere potentially crucial to provided positive effects on biodegradation resistance. Longifolene, caryophyllene and α-pinene inP. massoniana; 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy-benzaldehyde, 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamaldehyde and cinnamyl cinnamate inL. formosana; 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and 1,6-anhydro-β-d-glucopyranose inR. communisled to the opposite results. Keywords
No comments:
Post a Comment