Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance

Published Date
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 November 2010, Vol.139(3):293–301, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009
The carbon balance of European croplands

• Author 

• Bruce Osborne ^a,,
 
• Matt Saunders ^a
 
• David Walmsley ^a
 
• Michael Jones ^b
 
• Pete Smith ^c

• aUCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
• bDepartment of Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
• cInstitute of Biological & Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Cruickshank Building, St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, Scotland, UK

Received 19 August 2009. Revised 25 May 2010. Accepted 26 May 2010. Available online 23 June 2010.

Abstract

The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

Keywords

Carbon/greenhouse gas budgets

Component fluxes

Cropland diversity

Missing values

Uncertainties

---

 Table 1

Table 1.

Fig. 1.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author. Tel.: +353 17162249; fax: +353 17161153.
  
  

For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880910001490