Blog List

Saturday 4 March 2017

Nature Appropriation and Associations with Population Health in Canada’s Largest Cities

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 201310(4), 1268-1283; doi:10.3390/ijerph10041268

Author


1
Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
2
Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3T1, Canada
3
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. 
Received: 17 January 2013 / Revised: 21 February 2013 / Accepted: 20 March 2013 / Published: 26 March 2013
View Full-Text   |     Download PDF [312 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |    
 

Abstract 

Earth is a finite system with a limited supply of resources. As the human population grows, so does the appropriation of Earth’s natural capital, thereby exacerbating environmental concerns such as biodiversity loss, increased pollution, deforestation and global warming. Such concerns will negatively impact human health although it is widely believed that improving socio-economic circumstances will help to ameliorate environmental impacts and improve health outcomes. However, this belief does not explicitly acknowledge the fact that improvements in socio-economic position are reliant on increased inputs from nature. Gains in population health, particularly through economic means, are disconnected from the appropriation of nature to create wealth so that health gains become unsustainable. The current study investigated the sustainability of human population health in Canada with regard to resource consumption or “ecological footprints” (i.e., the resources required to sustain a given population). Ecological footprints of the 20 largest Canadian cities, along with several important determinants of health such as income and education, were statistically compared with corresponding indicators of human population health outcomes. A significant positive relationship was found between ecological footprints and life expectancy, as well as a significant negative relationship between ecological footprints and the prevalence of high blood pressure. Results suggest that increased appropriation of nature is linked to improved health outcomes. To prevent environmental degradation from excessive appropriation of natural resources will require the development of health promotion strategies that are de-coupled from ever-increasing and unsustainable resource use. Efforts to promote population health should focus on health benefits achieved from a lifestyle based on significantly reduced consumption of natural resources. View Full-Text
 Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).
For further details log on website :
http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/4/1268

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...