Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a40_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1188-1199.htm
Christos Kolympiris, Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes and Douglas Miller
Research Policy, 2011, vol. 40, issue 9, pages 1188-1199
Abstract: Biotechnology firms operate in a high-risk and high-reward environment and are in a constant race to secure venture capital (VC) funds. Previous contributions to the literature show that the VC firms tend to invest locally in order to monitor their investments and to provide operating assistance to their target firms. Further, biotechnology is a knowledge-based industry that tends to exhibit spatial clusters, and the firms in such industries may collocate to benefit from gaining access to local markets for specialized inputs (e.g., skilled researchers) and from local knowledge spillovers and network externalities. If such gains exist, we expect that the collocated firms should exhibit positively correlated performance, including in their ability to attract venture capital funds. The purpose of this paper is to empirically measure the strength and spatial extent of the relationships among the amount of funds raised by proximate biotechnology firms. We model these relationships with a spatial autoregression (SAR) model, and we control for characteristics of the biotechnology firms and the VC firms that provide their funds as well as site-specific factors. Based on our fitted SAR model, we find that the amount of venture capital raised by a particular biotechnology firm is significantly influenced by the number of VC firms and the VC funding levels raised by biotechnology firms located within a 10-mile radius, but these relationships are not statistically significant beyond this range.
Keywords: Venture capital; Biotechnology; Cluster scope; Knowledge spillovers; Network externalities; Dedicated biotechnology firms; Spatial externalities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C31 L25 O3 R12 L65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed
JEL-codes: C31 L25 O3 R12 L65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873331100103X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873331100103X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a40_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1188-1199.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment