Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rffdpaper/dp-13-11.htm
Abstract: Biomass energy is expected to play a major role in the substitution of renewable energy sources for fossil fuels over the next several decades. The US Energy Information Administration (EIA 2012) forecasts increases in the share of biomass in US energy production from 8 percent in 2009 to 15 percent by 2035. The general view has been that carbon emitted into the atmosphere from biological materials is carbon neutral—part of a closed loop whereby plant regrowth simply recaptures the carbon emissions associated with the energy produced. Recently this view has been challenged, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering regulations to be applied to biomass energy carbon emissions. A basic approach for analyses of environmental impacts has been the use of life cycle assessment (LCA), a methodology for assessing and measuring the environmental impact of a product over its lifetime—from raw material extraction through materials processing, manufacture, distribution, use, repair and maintenance, and disposal or recycling. However, LCA approaches vary, and the results of alternative methodologies often differ (Helin et al. 2012). This study investigates and compares the implications of these alternative approaches for emissions from wood biomass energy, the carbon footprint, and also highlights the differences in LCA environmental impacts.
Keywords: life cycle assessment; carbon neutrality; biomass; bioenergy; carbon dioxide; energy; rational expectations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q2 Q23 Q4 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-ene, nep-env and nep-res
Date: 2013-04-25
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
JEL-codes: Q2 Q23 Q4 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-ene, nep-env and nep-res
Date: 2013-04-25
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-13-11.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-13-11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-13-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Resources For the Future
Series data maintained by Webmaster (webmaster@rff.org).
Series data maintained by Webmaster (webmaster@rff.org).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rffdpaper/dp-13-11.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment