Published Date
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
15 May 2014, Vol.130:333–339, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.039
4th International Conference on Marketing and Retailing 2013, INCOMaR 2013
Open Access, Creative Commons license
Author
Abstract
The paper examines the relationships among brand distinctiveness, design innovation and brand performance of furniture manufacturers and the mediating effect of design innovation between brand distinctiveness and brand performance. Questionnaires were distributed to more than 500 manufacturers and 204 questionnaires were analyzed. A 49-item questionnaire which consists of brand distinctiveness, design innovation and brand performance were carried out to investigate the relations among these variables. Statistical evidence was found to confirm only functional innovation as one of the dimensions of design innovation that fully mediates the relationship between brand distinctiveness and brand performance. The paper researches the role of innovation-in a twofold perspective: innovation in product design innovation on brand performance, and as a mediator between brand distinctiveness and brand performance.
Keywords
Brand distinctiveness
functional innovation
meaning innovation
aesthetic innovation
typological innovation
brand performance
Malaysian furniture industry
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814029498
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
15 May 2014, Vol.130:333–339, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.039
4th International Conference on Marketing and Retailing 2013, INCOMaR 2013
Open Access, Creative Commons license
Author
Available online 5 June 2014.
The paper examines the relationships among brand distinctiveness, design innovation and brand performance of furniture manufacturers and the mediating effect of design innovation between brand distinctiveness and brand performance. Questionnaires were distributed to more than 500 manufacturers and 204 questionnaires were analyzed. A 49-item questionnaire which consists of brand distinctiveness, design innovation and brand performance were carried out to investigate the relations among these variables. Statistical evidence was found to confirm only functional innovation as one of the dimensions of design innovation that fully mediates the relationship between brand distinctiveness and brand performance. The paper researches the role of innovation-in a twofold perspective: innovation in product design innovation on brand performance, and as a mediator between brand distinctiveness and brand performance.
Keywords
References
- Abbing, 2010
- Abbing, E. R. (2010). Brand-Driven Innovation. Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.
- Aaker, 2007
- Aaker, D. A. (2007). Innovation: Brand It or Lose It. California Management Review, 50(1), 8-24.
- Anssary, 2006
- Anssary, A. El. (2006). An Approach to Support the Design Process Considering Technological Possibilities. Department of Art and Design. University of Duisburg-Essen.
- Adams et al., 1998
- Adams, E. M., Day, G. S., & Dougherty, D. (1998). Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 403-422.
- Anderson, 1988
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
- Arbuckle, 2003
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5.0 [Computer Software]. Chicago: SPSS.
- Ashby and Johnson, 2002
- Ashby, M., & Johnson, K. (2002). Materials and Design. The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design (Vol. Oxford). Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Bagozzi, 1988
- Bagozzi, R. P. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
- Bollen and Lennox, 1991
- Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional Wisdom on Measurement - a Structural Equation Perspective,. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305-331.
- Byrne, 2001
- Byrne, B M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Commodities, 2009
- Commodities, M. of P. I. and. (2009). National Timber Industry Policy . Putrajaya.
- Cooper, 1994
- Cooper, R. G. (1994). New products: the factors that drive success. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 60-76.
- Cooper et al., 2004
- Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2004). Benchmarking best NPD practices – I. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 31-43.
- Corp, 2012
- Corp, S. M. E. (2012). Furniture SMEs in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur.
- Council, 2012
- Council, M. F. P. (2012). MPFC & You.
- Verganti, 2009
- Dell ‘Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2009). Design-Driven laboratories:organization and strategy of laboratories specialized in the development of radical design-driven innovations. R&D Management, 39(1-21).
- Dola et al., 2011
- Dola, K., Rusli, A. N., & Noor, K. B. M. (2011). Investigating Users’ Acceptance in Designing and Marketing Sustainable New Product. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(6), 254-261.
- Edquist, 1997
- Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches — their emergence and characteristics. (C. Edquist, Ed.)Systems of Innovation Technologies, Institutions and Organisations (pp. 1-35). UK: London Pinter.
- Hair et al., 2006
- Hair, Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective 7th Edition (p. 770). New Jersey: Pearson Hall.
- Hair, 1998
- Hair, J. F., Jr., A., & R., T. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hashim et al., 2009
- Hashim, R., Sulaiman, O., Kumar, R. N., Tamyez, P. F., Murphy, R. J., & Z.Al. (2009). Physical and mechanical properties of flame retardant urea formaldehyde medium density fiberboard. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 635-640.
- Hansen, 2004
- Hovgaard, A., & Hansen, E. (2004). Innovativeness in the forest products industry. Forest Product Journal, 54(1), 26-33.
- Hu and Bentler, 1995
- Hu, & Bentler, P. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76-99). London: Sage.
- Chestnut, 1978
- Jacoby, J., & Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand Loyalty: Measurement and Management. NewYork, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
- Kam and Heng, 2010
- Kam, L. V., & Heng, L. C. (2010). Accelerating Innovations in Malaysian Industry Supply Chains. Institute of Supply Chain Management, Malaysia University of Science and Technology.
- Snelders, 2010
- Karjalainen, T.-M., & Snelders, D. (2010). Designing visual recognition for the brand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 6-22.
- Kline, 1998
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles And Practice Of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
- Calantone, 1998
- Li, T., & Calantone, R. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 62, 13-29.
- Lindman et al., 2008
- Lindman, M., Scozzi, B., & Otero-Neira, C. (2008). Low-tech, small- and medium-sized enterprises and the practice of new product development: An international comparison. European Business Review, 20(1), 51-72. doi:10.1108/09555340810843690.
- Malerba, 2004
- Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: basic concept. (F. Malerba, Ed.)Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concept, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. UK: Cambridge.
- Wrigley, 2011
- Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2011). Design and Design Thinking in Business and Management Education and Development. 25th Annual Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: The Future of Work and Organisations. Amora Hotel, Wellington, New Zealand.
- Montana et al., 2007
- Montana, J., Guzman, F., & Moll, I. (2007). Branding and Design Management: a brand design management model. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(9-10), 829-840.
- Mozota, 2004
- Mozota, B. B. D. (2004). Design management: Using design to build brand value and corporate innovation. Allworth Pr.
- Mozota, 2010
- Mozota, B. B. D. (2010a). The Brand Aesthetics Model: Reconciling Designers and Marketers on Brand Management. International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2010. Paris.
- Farinelli, 2000
- Mytelka, L., & Farinelli, F. (2000). Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness. Institute for New Technologies, The Netherlands: United Nations University.
- Ng, 2011b
- Ng, B. K., & K., T. (2011b). The dynamics of innovation in Malaysia's wooden furniture industry: Innovation actors and linkages. Forest Policy and Economics, 14, 107-118.
- Norman and Verganti, 2012
- Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2012). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research versus Technology and Meaning Change. Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces Conference. Milan.
- Omar, 2013
- Omar, N. (2013). MIFF Furniture Design Competition: A Tribute to the Shapes and Colours of Malaysia. Asian Timber, January/Fe.
- Pavitt, 2005
- Pavitt, K. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. (J. Fagerberg & A. R. R. Nelson, Eds.)Innovation processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hayes, 2008
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(879-891).
- Rampino, 2011
- Rampino, L. (2011). The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-Design Field. International Journal of Design, 5(1).
- Ratnasingam, 2000
- Ratnasingam, J. (2000). The Malaysian wood industry at the crossroads. Asian Timber, 19, 10-13.
- Ratnasingam, 2004
- Ratnasingam, J. (2004). Furniture Market Outlook: Expectations and Challenges. In Optimizing Competitive Advantage for a Resilient Furniture Industry in Sarawak. Sarawak.
- Lojacono, 2005
- Ravasi, D., & Lojacono, G. (2005). Managing design and designers for strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 51-77.
- Reduction, 2009
- Reduction, P. (2009). Malaysia Productivity and Investment Climate Assessment Update. Unit East Asia and Pacific Region.
- Reichheld, 1996
- Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The Loyalty Effect . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Slater and Narver, 1995
- Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59, 63-74.
- Vedin et al., 2006
- Vedin, B.-A., Alvarez, E., Ekman, S., Sanderson, S. W., Tether, B., & Verganti, R. (2006). Design-Inspired Innovation. Imperial College Press-World Scientific Publishers.
- Vega-Juradov et al., 2009
- Vega-Juradov, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Fernández-De-Lucio, I. (2009). Does External Knowledge Sourcing Matter for Innovation? Evidence from the Spanish Manufacturing Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(4), 637-670.
- Verganti, 2009a
- Verganti, R. (2009a). Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Harvard Business Press.
- Verganti, 2009b
- Verganti, R. (2009b). Designs, Meanings and radical innovation: A meta-model and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
- Vianna et al., 2012
- Vianna, M., Vianna, Y., Adler, I. K., Lucena, B., & Russo, B. (2012). Design Thinking: Business Innovation. Rio de Janeiro: MJV Press.
- Weerawardena, 2003
- Weerawardena, J. (2003). Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 37(3/4), 407-429.
- Merrilees, 2008
- Wong, H. Y., & Merrilees, B. (2008). The performance benefits of being brand-orientated. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(6), 372-383.
- Zurlo et al., 2002
- Zurlo, F., Cagliano, R., Simonelli, G., & Verganti, R. (2002). Innovating through Design. The Case of Italian Lighting Industry. Milano: Il Sole 24Ore.
- ☆Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of INCOMaR 2013.
- ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +012-613-8147.
Crown copyright © 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814029498
No comments:
Post a Comment