International Forestry Review 13(2):136-151. 2011
https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811797406642
Opportunités et contraintes pour renforcer la prise de puissance économique des femmes dans les chaînes de valeur de trois produits forestiers autres que le bois de forêt africaine sèche
Oportunidades y restricciones para la mejora del empoderamiento económico de la mujer en las cadenas de valor de tres productos forestales no maderables (NTFPs) del bosque seco africano
Author
L. Westholm . (2016) Fruits from the Forest and the Fields: Forest Conservation Policies and Intersecting Social Inequalities in Burkina Faso's REDD+ Program. International Forestry Review 18:4, 511-521.
Online publication date: 4-Jan-2017.
O. Sylvester , A. García Segura and I. Davidson-Hunt . (2016) Complex Relationships Among Gender and Forest Food Harvesting: Insights from the Bribri Indigenous Territory, Costa Rica. International Forestry Review 18:2, 247-260.
Online publication date: 20-Jun-2016.
C.J.P. Colfer, M. Elias and R. Jamnadass . (2015) Women and Men in Tropical Dry Forests: A Preliminary Review. International Forestry Review 17:S2, 70-90.
Online publication date: 11-Sep-2015.
A.M. Larson, T. Dokken, A.E. Duchelle, S. Atmadja, I.A.P. Resosudarmo, P. Cronkleton, M. Cromberg, W. Sunderlin, A. Awono and G. Selaya . (2015) The Role of Women in Early REDD+ Implementation: Lessons for Future Engagement. International Forestry Review 17:1, 43-65.
Online publication date: 7-Apr-2015.
For further detail slog on website :
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1505/146554811797406642
https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811797406642
Opportunités et contraintes pour renforcer la prise de puissance économique des femmes dans les chaînes de valeur de trois produits forestiers autres que le bois de forêt africaine sèche
Oportunidades y restricciones para la mejora del empoderamiento económico de la mujer en las cadenas de valor de tres productos forestales no maderables (NTFPs) del bosque seco africano
Author
REFERENCES
Adedayo, A.G., Oyun, M.B. and Kadeba, O. 2010. Access of rural women to forest resources and its impact on rural household welfare in North Central Nigeria. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 439–450. Crossref
Brown, K. and Lapuyade, S. 2001. A livelihood from the forest: gendered visions of social, economic and environmental change in Southern Cameroon. Journal of International Development 13(8): 1131–1149.Crossref
Carr, M. 2008. Gender and non-timber forest products: Promoting food security and economic empowerment.International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Italy.
Chabala, C. 2004. Forest management in Zambia: A focus on women's access to forest resources management in Chief Chiwala's area, Masaiti District. Masters thesis, Southern African Regional Centre for Women's Law, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.
DFID. 2000. Poverty alleviation and the empowerment of women. DFID, London.
Elias, M and Carney, J. 2007. African Shea butter: A feminised subsidy from nature. Africa 77(1): 37–62.Crossref
Elmhirst, R and Resurreccion, B.P. 2008. Gender, environment and natural resource management: New dimensions, new debates. In: Resurreccion, B.P. and Elmhirst, R. (eds.) Gender and natural resource management: Livelihoods, mobility and interventions. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA.
Esplen, E. and Brody, A. 2007. Putting Gender Back in the Picture: Rethinking Women's Economic Empowerment. BRIDGE (development — gender), University of Sussex, Brighton.
FAO. Undated a. Assessing the value of non-timber forest products to local people. FAO corporate document repository. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/t9450e/t9450e09.htm.
FAO. Undated b. Men and women in forest activities: Differences and complementarities. FAO corporate document repository. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w6206e/w6206e02.htm.
Gausset, Q., Yago-Ouattara, E.L. and Belem, B. 2005. Gender and trees in Péni, South-Western Burkina Faso. Women's needs, strategies and challenges. Danish Journal of Geography 105(1): 67–76. Crossref
Hasalkar, S. and Jadhav, V. 2004. Role of women in the use of non-timber forest produce: A review. Journal of Social Science 8(3): 203–206.
Hecht, S.B. 2007. Factories, Forests, Fields and Family: Gender and Neoliberalism in Extractive Reserves.Journal of Agrarian Change 7(3): 316–347. Crossref
ILO. 2006. A guide for value chain analysis and upgrading. International Labour Organisation (ILO), Geneva.
Jones, N., Holmes, R. and Espey, J. 2008. Gender and the MDGs. Briefing paper 42, September 2008. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London.
Kalu, C. and Rachael, E. 2006. Women in Processing and Marketing of Non-timber Forest Products: Case Study of Benin City, Nigeria. Journal of Agronomy 5(2): 326–331. Crossref
Kaplinsky, R., and Morris, M. 2000. A handbook for value chain research: IDRC, Ottowa.
Kassa, H., B. Tefera and G. Fitwi. 2011. Preliminary value chain analysis of gums and resins marketing in Ethiopia: Issues for policy and research. Policy Brief. CIFOR. Bogor. Indonesia.
Lemenih, M., Abebe, T. and Olsson, M. 2003. Gumresins from some Acacia, Boswellia and Commiphora species and their economic contributions in Liban zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environment 55: 465–482. Crossref
Lemenih, M. and Kassa, H. 2010b. Socio-economic and environmental significance of dry land resources of Ethiopia and their development challenges. Journal of Agriculture and Development: 71–91.
Lemenih, M. and Kassa, H. 2010a. Opportunities and challenges for the production and marketing of gums and resins in Ethiopia., Working Paper, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. 88 p.
Mickels-Kokwe, G. 2006. Small-scale woodland-based enterprises with outstanding economic potential: the case of honey in Zambia. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 82 p.
Mulenga, A.M. and Chizhuka, F. 2003. Industry profile of honey in Zambia. Lusaka (mimeograph).
Neumann, R.P. and Hirsch, E. 2000. Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research. Center for International Forestry and Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
Schreckenberg, K. and Marshall, E. 2006. Women and NTFPs: Improving income and status? In: Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K. and Newton, A.C. (eds.) Commercialization of non-timber forest products: Factors influencing success. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. 136 p. Available at: http://quin.unep-wcmc.org/forest/ntfp/gender.cfm?displang=eng.
SEWA. 2000. The gum collectors: Struggling to survive in the dry areas of Banaskantha. SEWA, Ahmedabad, India.
Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, 2004. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: A review of evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science: 658–664.
Shackleton, S.E. and Shackleton, C.M. 2005. The contribution of marula (Sclerocarya birrea) fruit and fruit products to rural livelihoods in the Bushbuckridge district, South Africa: Balancing domestic needs and commercialisation. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 15(1): 3–24. Crossref
Shackleton, S.E. and Shackleton, C.M. 2010. Exploring the role of wild natural resources in poverty alleviation with an emphasis on South Africa. In: Hebinck, P. and Shackleton, C.M. (eds). Reforming land and resource use in South Africa: impact on livelihoods. Routledge.
Shackleton, S.E., Shanley, P. and Ndoye, O. 2007. Viable but invisible: Recognising local markets for non-timber forest products. International Forestry Review 9(3): 697–712. Link
Shackleton, S.E., Campbell, B., Lotz-Sisitka, H. and Shackleton, C.M. 2008. Links between the local trade in natural products, livelihoods and poverty alleviation in a semi-arid region of South Africa. World Development 36(3): 505–526. Crossref
Shillington, L.J. 2002. Non-timber Forest Products, Gender, and Households in Nicaragua: A Commodity Chain Analysis. M.Sc. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia. 103 p.
UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC). 2009. Available at: http://quin.unep-wcmc.org/forest/ntfp/gender.cfm?displan.
Williams. P.J. Undated. NGOS, women and forestry activities in Africa. Unaslyva, 171. FAO, Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/u7760e/u7760e08.htm.
World Bank. 2007–10. World Bank's gender and equity plan. World Bank, Washington DC.
Wynberg, R., Laird, S., Shackleton, S., Mander, M., Shackleton, C., Du Plessis, P., Den Adel, S., Leakey, R.R.B., Botelle, A., Lombard, C., Sullivan, C., Cunningham, T. and O'Regan, D. 2003. Marula commercialisation for sustainable and equitable livelihoods. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13(3): 203–215. Crossref
NTFPs are biological products harvested from natural forests and human modified landscapes that are used for household consumption or trade in either a raw or processed form (Shackleton et al. 2011).
Gum pickers receive about 0.33 to 0.44 USD/kg from middle men (who can earn up to.0.67 to 0.89 USD/kg from exporters). The amount of gum that one person can pick generally varies from less than 1 kg/day to 2 kg/day depending on the productivity of the gum trees, the distance to the gum stands, and the level of involvement in the activity (picking as set task or on an ad hoc basis). There are about 90 picking days per year as a maximum.
This is being implemented in the Amhara and Tigrai regions, but raw products from southern Ethiopia and from Benishangul Gumuz State are still transported to major cities for cleaning and grading.
Cited by
Online publication date: 4-Jan-2017.
Online publication date: 20-Jun-2016.
Online publication date: 11-Sep-2015.
Online publication date: 7-Apr-2015.
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1505/146554811797406642
No comments:
Post a Comment