Change in evapotranspiration partitioning after thinning in a Japanese cypress plantation

Original Article

First Online: 

28 April 2017

DOI: 10.1007/s00468-017-1555-1

Cite this article as:

Sun, X., Onda, Y., Otsuki, K. et al. Trees (2017). doi:10.1007/s00468-017-1555-1

Author

• Xinchao Sun
  • 1
  Email authorView author's OrcID profile
• Yuichi Onda
  • 2
• Kyoichi Otsuki
  • 3
• Hiroaki Kato
  • 2
• Takashi Gomi
  • 4
• Xueyan Liu
  • 1
  Email author

1. 1.Institute of Surface-Earth System ScienceTianjin University Tianjin China
2. 2.Center for Research in Isotopes and Environmental Dynamics University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
3. 3.Kasuya Research Forest Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
4. 4.Department of International Environmental and Agricultural ScienceTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Abstract

Key message

Thinning resulted in evapotranspiration decrease and caused the relative contributions of each component to evapotranspiration to become very close.

Abstract

To increase the understanding of forest management to control water cycles, we examined the effect of 50% strip thinning on evapotranspiration (ET) and its partitioning into canopy interception (Ei), tree transpiration (Et), and forest floor evaporation (Ef) in a Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) plantation. Intensive measurements were employed to monitor each component of ET during the pre- and post-thinning periods. The results showed the annual Et was the dominant component of ET followed by Ei, whereas Ef was the smallest component in both periods. Thinning has significant impact on the process of ET partitioning. In such that it decreased from 42.3 to 33.7% in Ei/ET and from 45.0 to 34.9% in Et/ET, and increased from 12.7 to 31.4% in Ef/ET on an annual scale. The relative contributions of each ET component to the whole ET became more or less the same after thinning. Additionally, the monthly Ei/Pg had relative stable values in both pre- and post-thinning periods, contributing significantly to the ET/Pg during heavy rainfall conditions. After thinning, ET decreased by 21.4% from 629.3 to 494.8 mm during the growing season and by 20.4% from 979.8 to 780.1 mm at the annual scale, demonstrating that thinning results in an increase in water availability in the forested watershed. This study can improve the understanding of forest water budget in response to thinning and aid in development of appropriate forest management practices accordingly.

Keywords

Chamaecyparis obtusa Forest management Forest floor evaporation Canopy interception Tree transpiration 

Communicated by L. Gratani.

References

1. Allen RG (2008) Why do we care about ET? Southwest Hydrol 7:18–19Google Scholar
2. Benyon RG, Doody TM (2014) Comparison of interception, forest floor evaporation and transpiration in Pinus radiata and Eucalyptus globulus plantations. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.10237Google Scholar
3. Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. Bosch JM, Hewlett JD (1982) A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapo-transpiration. J Hydrol 55:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Breda N, Granier A, Aussenac G (1995) Effects of thinning on soil and tree water relations, transpiration and growth in an oak forest (Quercus-Petraea (Matt) Liebl). Tree Physiol 15:295–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. Daikoku K, Hattori S, Deguchi A, Aoki Y, Miyashita M, Matsumoto K, Akiyama J, Iida S, Toba T, Fujita Y, Ohta T (2008) Influence of evaporation from the forest floor on evapotranspiration from the dry canopy. Hydrol Process 22:4083–4096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dung BX, Gomi T, Miyata S, Sidle RC, Kosugi K, Onda Y (2012) Runoff responses to forest thinning at plot and catchment scales in a headwater catchment draining Japanese cypress forest. J Hydrol 444:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3:309–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. Hawthorne SND, Lane PNJ, Bren LJ, Sims NC (2013) The long term effects of thinning treatments on vegetation structure and water yield. For Ecol Manag 310:983–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Japan Forestry Agency (2014) Data for Japanese cedar and cypress plantations. http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/sin_riyou/kafun/data.html. Accessed Mar 2012
11. Jasechko S, Sharp ZD, Gibson JJ, Birks SJ, Yi Y, Fawcett PJ (2013) Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature 496:347–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. Komatsu H, Kume T (2015) Changes in the sapwood area of Japanese cedar and cypress plantations after thinning. J For Res 20:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Komatsu H, Maita E, Otsuki K (2008) A model to estimate annual forest evapotranspiration in Japan from mean annual temperature. J Hydrol 348:330–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kosugi Y, Katsuyama M (2007) Evapotranspiration over a Japanese cypress forest. II. Comparison of the eddy covariance and water budget methods. J Hydrol 334:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Tanaka H, Ohkubo S, Tani M, Yano M, Katayama T (2007) Evapotranspiration over a Japanese cypress forest. I. Eddy covariance fluxes and surface conductance characteristics for 3 years. J Hydrol 337:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kumagai T, Aoki S, Shimizu T, Otsuki K (2007) Sap flow estimates of stand transpiration at two slope positions in a Japanese cedar forest watershed. Tree Physiol 27:161–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
17. Kumagai T, Tateishi M, Miyazawa Y, Kobayashi M, Yoshifuji N, Komatsu H, Shimizu T (2014) Estimation of annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in Japan (1): water use components in Japanese cedar stands. J Hydrol 508:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Kume T, Tanaka N, Kuraji K, Komatsu H, Yoshifuji N, Saitoh TM, Suzuki M, Kumagai T (2011) Ten-year evapotranspiration estimates in a Bornean tropical rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 151:1183–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Molina AJ, del Campo AD (2012) The effects of experimental thinning on throughfall and stemflow: a contribution towards hydrology-oriented silviculture in Aleppo pine plantations. For Ecol Manag 269:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Morikawa Y, Hattori S, Kiyono Y (1986) Transpiration of a 31-year-old Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl. stand before and after thinning. Tree Physiol 2:105–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
21. Oishi AC, Oren R, Stoy PC (2008) Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: a footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 148:1719–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Onda Y, Gomi T, Mizugaki S, Nonoda T, Sidle RC (2010) An overview of the field and modelling studies on the effects of forest devastation on flooding and environmental issues. Hydrol Process 24:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the Assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Raz-Yaseef N, Rotenberg E, Yakir D (2010) Effects of spatial variations in soil evaporation caused by tree shading on water flux partitioning in a semi-arid pine forest. Agric For Meteorol 150:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Raz-Yaseef N, Yakir D, Schiller G, Cohen S (2012) Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning in a semi-arid forest as affected by temporal rainfall patterns. Agric For Meteorol 157:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Saito T, Matsuda H, Komatsu M, Xiang Y, Takahashi A, Shinohara Y, Otsuki K (2013) Forest canopy interception loss exceeds wet canopy evaporation in Japanese cypress (Hinoki) and Japanese cedar (Sugi) plantations. J Hydrol 507:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Shimizu T, Kumagai T, Kobayashi M, Tamai K, Iida S, Kabeya N, Ikawa R, Tateishi M, Miyazawa Y, Shimizu A (2015) Estimation of annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in Japan (2): comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus interception loss. J Hydrol 522:250–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Shinohara Y, Tsuruta K, Ogura A, Noto F, Komatsu H, Otsuki K, Maruyama T (2013) Azimuthal and radial variations in sap flux density and effects on stand-scale transpiration estimates in a Japanese cedar forest. Tree Physiol 33:550–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
29. Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW (2007) The influence of thinning on components of stand water balance in a ponderosa pine forest stand during and after extreme drought. Agric For Meteorol 143:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Sun X, Onda Y, Kato H, Otsuki K, Gomi T (2014a) Partitioning of the total evapotranspiration in a Japanese cypress plantation during the growing season. Ecohydrol 7:1042–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Sun X, Onda Y, Otsuki K, Kato H, Hirata A, Gomi T (2014b) The effect of strip thinning on tree transpiration in a Japanese cypress plantation (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) plantation. Agric For Meteorol 197:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Sun X, Onda Y, Kato H (2014c) Incident rainfall partitioning and canopy interception modeling for an abandoned Japanese cypress stand. J For Res 19:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Teklehaimanot Z, Jarvis PG, Ledger DC (1991) Rainfall interception and boundary-layer conductance in relation to tree spacing. J Hydrol 123:261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Teramage MT, Onda Y, Patin J, Kato H, Gomi T, Nam S (2014) Vertical distribution of radiocesium in coniferous forest soil after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. J Environ Radioact 137:37–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
35. Vesala T, Suni T, Rannik U, Keronen P, Markkanen T, Sevanto S, Gronholm T, Smolander S, Kulmala M, Ilvesniemi H, Ojansuu R, Uotila A, Levula J, Makela A, Pumpanen J, Kolari P, Kulmala L, Altimir N, Berninger F, Nikinmaa E, Hari P (2005) Effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 19:GB2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Wilson KB, Hanson PJ, Mulholland PJ, Baldocchi DD, Wullschleger SD (2001) A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance. Agric For Meteorol 106:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37:701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Zimmermann B, Zimmermann A, Lark RM, Elsenbeer H (2010) Sampling procedures for throughfall monitoring: a simulation study. Water Resour Res 46:W01503Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

For further details log on website :
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-017-1555-1