Author
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440315001016
L.Caruso FerméaI.ClementebM.T.Civaleroc
- a
- CONICET, Centro Nacional Patagónico, Bvard Marron 2915 U9120 ACD (9120), Puerto Madryn, Argentina
- b
- Departamento de Arqueología y Antropología, Institución Milá i Fontanals (CSIC), Spain
- c
- CONICET, Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano, 3 de Febrero 1370, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Received 6 December 2014, Revised 10 March 2015, Accepted 11 March 2015, Available online 20 March 2015.
Highlights
- •
- Wood technology of Patagonian hunter–gatherers.
- •
- Botanical identification.
- •
- Morphological analysis.
- •
- Tracing analysis.
- •
- The analysis of traces preserved on the surface of a wooden artefact.
Abstract
In the Patagonian archaeological record, the preservation of wooden artefacts is very restricted. Functional analysis of lithic artefacts is a way to get a better understanding about the use and consumption of the wood. Technological and use-wear analyses are applied in order to reconstruct the production processes of the wooden artefacts, from the raw-material supplying to the production of the finished tools.
In this paper we present the results of a taxonomical and techno-functional analysis of the traces preserved on the surface of the two wooden artefact retrieved from layer 17 (9390 ± 40 C14 years BP) and layer 6 (5310 ± 110 BP) at the site of Cerro Casa de Piedra 7 (province of Santa Cruz, Patagonia, Argentina). The interpretation of these two objects is complicated due to the absence of ethnographical references and the lack of similar archaeological findings in Patagonian hunter–gatherers sites. However, through the observation of the use-wear traces it is possible to reconstruct part of the manufacturing process and advance hypothesis on their mode of employment. Due to the distribution of the wears and the mineral-organic residues identified on the surfaces, it is proposed that one of the wooden artefact was probably used for rock-art production.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440315001016
No comments:
Post a Comment